For decades after the Cold War, the world made slow but steady progress in reducing nuclear arsenals. But now, that trend has reversed. According to SIPRI’s latest report, as of January 2025, there are still 12,241 nuclear warheads in existence with 9,614 actively stockpiled by militaries and a chilling 2,100 kept on high-alert status, ready to launch at a moment’s notice.
Instead of moving toward disarmament, all nine nuclear-armed nations: the U.S., Russia, China, the U.K., France, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel are expanding or upgrading their arsenals. The world isn’t stepping back from the nuclear brink; it’s inching closer.
A New Arms Race Is Underway
- U.S. & Russia: Though their deployed numbers stayed steady in 2024, both are pouring billions into modernizing missiles, submarines, and launch systems. The message is clear: they see nuclear weapons as a long-term necessity.
- China: Now the fastest-growing nuclear power, adding 100 warheads per year since 2023. By early 2025, it likely has 600 warheads, along with new ICBM silos and, for the first time, some warheads on high alert.
- India & Pakistan: Locked in a regional arms race, both now have 170 warheads each and are developing more advanced missiles capable of striking multiple targets.
- North Korea: Estimated to have 50 warheads, with the capacity to build more and now working on tactical nukes for potential battlefield use.
- U.K. & France: The U.K. is. increasing its warhead cap to 260, while France is upgrading its nuclear submarines and missiles.
- Israel: Still officially silent on its arsenal (estimated 90 warheads) but modernizing its nuclear facilities.
The Terrifying Risks: Hair-Trigger Alerts and AI Escalation
The most alarming detail? 2,100 warheads are on high-alert status, mostly held by the U.S., Russia, and China. A false alarm, a technical glitch, or a rushed decision could trigger catastrophe. And now, AI is entering the equation. SIPRI warns that artificial intelligence in nuclear command systems could speed up decision-making, shrink the time leaders have to assess threats, and increase the risk of accidental war.
As SIPRI Director Dan Smith puts it: “We continue to see year-on-year increases in operational nuclear warheads… This trend seems likely to accelerate, and it is extremely concerning.”
The safeguards of the Cold War—human judgment, deliberate processes—are being replaced by automated systems that could make fatal mistakes in seconds.
What This Means for the World?
- Geopolitical tensions (Ukraine, Taiwan, South Asia) are driving nations to see nukes as their ultimate insurance policy.
- Arms control agreements are collapsing, with little trust left between major powers.
- AI and automation are adding a dangerous new layer of unpredictability.
But beyond the politics and technology, there’s a human cost. Billions spent on nukes could instead fund healthcare, education, climate action yet governments keep choosing weapons over welfare.
Is There Still Time to Turn Back?
The world is at a dangerous crossroads. The era of disarmament is over, replaced by a new, high-tech arms race with even greater risks.
The only way out? Reviving diplomacy, imposing AI safeguards, and reducing high-alert deployments. If governments won’t act, public pressure must force them. Because in a world with thousands of nukes on hair-trigger alert, luck isn’t a sustainable strategy.
As Smith warns: “This is a perilous inflection point.”
The question is: Will we pull back before it’s too late?
Shreya Gupta is a trainee journalist at Cult Current. The views expressed in the article are
her ownand do not necessarily reflect the official stance of Cult Current