The conflict between the Chinese government and the Dalai Lama over the selection of his successor has emerged as a high-stakes power struggle that transcends borders, religions, and ideologies. At the heart of the issue lies the centuries-old Tibetan Buddhist tradition of reincarnation, which China seeks to politicize and control in order to cement its influence over Tibet.
According to a 2007 directive called “Order No. 5,” China declared that all reincarnations of Tibetan lamas, including the Dalai Lama, must be approved by the Chinese Communist Party. This law effectively gives the state authority over religious practices that have historically remained independent of political influence.
The 14th Dalai Lama, who has lived in exile in India since 1959, has firmly rejected China’s claim. He has repeatedly stated that his reincarnation will be born outside of China and identified by legitimate Tibetan Buddhist leaders—not by government decree. This declaration is both spiritual and political—an effort to preserve the sanctity of Tibetan Buddhism and to resist Chinese interference.
Politically, China’s attempt to control the next Dalai Lama is a calculated move to eliminate the influence of the Tibetan independence movement, which continues to resonate among the diaspora and global supporters. Beijing views the Dalai Lama not just as a spiritual figure, but as a separatist threat. By appointing a state-approved successor, China hopes to neutralize this threat and strengthen its grip over Tibet, a region of strategic and geopolitical importance.
However, the Dalai Lama’s stance complicates this plan, as any Chinese-endorsed spiritual leader is likely to be rejected by Tibetans both inside and outside the country. This raises the possibility of two competing Dalai Lamas in the future—one chosen by the exiled Tibetan religious community and another appointed by Beijing—leading to religious confusion and division among followers.
Religiously, the Chinese approach undermines the core of Tibetan Buddhist belief, which holds that the identification of a reincarnated lama is a sacred process involving visions, signs, and collective recognition by high-ranking monks. The state’s interference not only disrespects this tradition but also threatens to permanently damage the integrity of Tibetan Buddhism. Tibetan monasteries in China have already been subjected to tight surveillance, censorship, and forced indoctrination. The prospect of a government-approved Dalai Lama is seen by many as a final blow to religious freedom in Tibet.
Meanwhile, exiled Tibetan communities and spiritual leaders continue to prepare for a legitimate succession process, emphasizing the importance of preserving ancient religious customs despite political pressures.
Internationally, this issue has sparked significant debate and concern. Countries like the United States have passed legislation supporting the Tibetan people’s right to choose their religious leaders without Chinese interference. India, home to the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan government-in-exile, finds itself in a sensitive position—caught between strategic rivalry with China and the need to support Tibetan cultural and religious freedom.
Other nations and human rights organizations have criticized China’s stance as a violation of basic religious rights. The succession issue has thus become a touchstone in global diplomatic relations with China, reflecting broader concerns about authoritarian overreach, religious persecution, and cultural erasure.
For global Tibetan Buddhist communities, the outcome of this struggle will shape the future of their faith and identity. The fear of a politically manipulated succession has led to growing solidarity among Tibetan exiles and supporters worldwide, who are calling for international recognition of the Dalai Lama’s right to determine his own reincarnation.
The looming question of succession is not just about who the next Dalai Lama will be, but about who has the moral and spiritual authority to decide. As the current Dalai Lama ages, this conflict is intensifying, representing not only a battle over leadership but a broader fight for cultural survival, spiritual independence, and global recognition of religious freedom in the face of political power.
Akansha Sharma is a trainee journalist at Cult Current. The views expressed in the article are
her ownand do not necessarily reflect the official stance of Cult Current.